Week 4 Montage - Battleship Potempkin - Odessa Steps scene (Einsenstein 1925)


This here is a successful use of a montage sequence with the scene cutting from the boys reaction to two different people. In the first scene we see the women twirling her umbrella and smiling, and from this we see the reaction of the boy look concerned. At this moment we are unaware why his face is like this as there is nothing signifying to the audience that we should be concerned. But with the use of editing, we cut to the image of the limbless man waving, which gives some explanation to the viewer to possibly why he feels uncomfortable to wave. Later on we see the boy is somewhat forced to wave and this begins to create some questions for the viewer. 

The most important thing to understand form this is with the use of a montage you have the possibility to lose geographical location and because of this the viewer has to question what the individual is looking at. This is a good tool to use in your work, as it allows for each viewer to have a different view of the scene. It is no longer linear so there is room for personal takes and opinions. This makes for a better viewing and therefore a better viewing experience.






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2 Question - How might it be possible to hide or even negate the "self" through the acts of self-portraiture or self-representation?

Within self-portraiture there is of course a representation of the individual who made the piece, however this does not mean that in these pieces of work the work doesn't negate from the individuals actual 'self'. A prime example of this is looking at Cindy Sherman's work, where she photographs herself, but in a form that is of course not her true 'self'. Within her work she presents herself in a grotesque manner that defers form the norm of how women are presented in the media. This is an example of a Masquerade, as she is hiding herself with something else. In this case, she is hiding herself with an excess of make up and props. This is one example of how you can hide your 'self' through self portraiture or self representation.
Read more

Week 1 Question - How do we identify/locate/describe 'value' in works of art, particularly media art?

 The idea of 'value' in any piece of art is extremely subjective for each individual who indulges in this craft. This value may be in the work of art itself, a reproduction or not, by enjoying the work of art for what it is. It could also be in knowing that the one piece you have is the only piece in the world, the value being the authenticity of the piece.  There are many different ways a viewer of art can deem the value of it. But, a more objective way of looking at it is the monetary value some artwork hold. The higher the price is a much more objective way of looking at the idea of more value. We see the highest priced artwork is in fact the authentic piece of work, the very first piece. This is due to the fact this original version is deemed to still withhold it's 'aura' and therefore it's true value. So one way to identify 'value' in a work of art is to identify whether it is the authentic piece of work and not a reproduction. Of course that object...
Read more

Week 6 Reading - Sharon Daniel's Public Secret, critical discussion of her work

The main thing I took from this reading is how it may benefit me in my documentary making process, in finding ideas and choosing to persue them. There is an explanation in this reading about the benefits of voyeurism and looking into minority groups' stories, as you can give a platform for these people to get their message out there. The reason for documentaries with people in less fortunate positions being so necessary and needed is it gives those that wouldn't otherwise be able to speak out, the possibility to do so. Where we mostly see the news manipulate stories on them, we are able to get a truer depiction through voyeurism and looking into them. 
Read more